| Articles » Creating Productive Project Cultures |
|
Creating Productive Project Cultures |
| by Michael Stanleigh |
|
“Many of the delays in individual projects
arise from problems at the senior management level”
– Eli Goldratt, “Critical Chain” |
| How productive is your organization’s culture with regard
to projects? As a project manager, are you often frustrated with
your organization’s project culture and lack of support? Here
are 7 things you need to do to make sure your project culture is
supportive and productive. |
|
| 1. | Take responsibility for your individual role in ensuring project success |
|
|
| It’s wrong to lay all blame on senior management for the problems
experienced in the management of projects and their outcomes. Rather,
it is also up to Project Managers to educate their sponsors (generally
members of senior management) in what is expected of them, which will
help to ensure project success. |
|
| How Should Project Managers Educate a Sponsor? |
|
| It is not uncommon for Sponsors to be unaware of their responsibilities
in helping to ensure project success. Sponsors are generally strategically
focused; not task focused, and as such do not need to understand
the details of managing a project. That's the project manager and
project team's responsibility.
It would be great if all project sponsors could attend a full project
management workshop, but realistically, they wouldn't have the
time necessary to learn the entire project management process. As
well, they wouldn’t be managing the project at a micro level
and the knowledge gained would be of a lesser value than for those
assuming a project manager or project team role.
The sponsor does, however, need to understand the project management
process and the role they have to play in helping ensure the project's
success. This requires far less of a time commitment on their part.
The project manager should advise their sponsor (thereby providing
them with knowledge and education) on some of their responsibilities: |
|
- Approval of the scope statement:
- When the scope statement will be ready for the Sponsor’s review.
- The requirement of both project manager and project sponsor to sign-off and form agreement on the project's scope.
- Sign off on the project plan:
- When the sponsor should expect to see, review and approve
the high-level project plan.
- Project Milestones:
- When the sponsor should expect to see reports with a listing
of all the established project milestones.
- Project Plan Updates:
- The frequency in which sponsors may expect to receive project
reports and updates and the timeframe for approvals.
- Project Plan Updates:
- The frequency in which sponsors may expect to receive project reports and updates and the timeframe for approvals.
- The Process for Managing Issues:
- The expectations of both the project manager and sponsor in regards to issue management. How will issues that may arise be handled?
- The Process for Managing Change:
- The expectations of the project manager and sponsor in regards to management of change.
- The Process for Managing Project Risk:
- The process for identifying, accessing, and managing project risk and the role of the sponsor in assisting in risk management.
- Project Closeout and Evaluation:
- The process for a closeout evaluation of the project.
|
|
| 2. | Be prepared to address management’s issues about project management |
|
|
| Gaining Management’s Commitment |
|
The questions senior management is likely to wrestle with are: Why
bother? Why change? Even if they understand the potential positive
impact of managing projects more pragmatically, it still tends not
to be enough of a motivator to create the change. Oftentimes, management
does not truly see the benefits for change.
Management may be asking, ”How will project management affect
our organization? Customers? People? Profitability? Quality?”
The answers to these questions are the drivers towards change. The
other key concern may be, does it have to be done now or can it
wait?
One more issue for senior management is, if they give their projects
over to project managers, will they lose power? Management may be
experiencing a “perceived” loss of power when managing
by projects. Initially, this can be difficult to overcome with them.
To address these management concerns, project managers must be able
to answer the following questions:
- What are the benefits of project management to the organization?
- It’s astounding how often this piece is missed. What
are the real benefits to the organization? To its future? Its profitability?
Its customers and staff? If they have the answers to these questions,
then the change will be easier to accept. Research indicates that
there are many benefits for organizations that manage by projects
such as: increased profitability and customer satisfaction due to
more on-time, on-budget, customer-focused project management techniques.
However, management must determine its own drivers for change.
- Are other organizations doing it?
- Perhaps yes, but so what? Using examples of other organizations
is not always a motivator for change. Every organization has different
products, customers, culture, etc. It is better to show management
the unique benefits to their own organization rather then to attempt
to make comparisons to others.
- Will I lose power as a senior manager to project teams?
- When an organization creates more work to be done in teams
either as a project, for process improvement or reengineering, senior
management may sometimes become concerned about a perceived loss
of power. While this is usually more their perception than it is
reality, management may fear a loss of control because their day-to-day
routine and decision-making is taken away and moved downwards within
the organization.
-
Project managers need to address this fear by reassuring management
about project planning parameters and the control mechanisms that
senior management could and should set to ensure they are involved
in the “important” decisions, rather than all decisions.
Senior management needs time for planning the organization’s
future. Project management provides them with a chance to push decision-making
down while at the same time establishing control mechanisms and
parameters for teams, so they remain in control.
|
|
| 3. | Link project management with quality processes and matrix management structures |
|
|
If you always do what you’ve always done,
you’ll always get what you’ve always gotten. If you
always change and improve what you’ve always done, you’ll
always exceed what you’ve always done.
--Michael Stanleigh |
| In my experience the application of quality systems
and processes to projects results in more successful projects. As
part of this, it is important to consider the complexities of how
employees who work on projects will be managed. Since many organizations
work within the complexities of a matrix management structure, successful
execution of projects requires negotiation between line and functional
managers as well as between project managers and the functional
manager.
To complete projects successfully, organizations require: |
- Teams
- Partnerships with their customers
- Strategic Planning
- Quality systems and processes to manage these
|
On a project, the project manager is responsible for identifying: |
- What tasks must be done in order to achieve the objectives
of the project?
- By when is it necessary to complete the tasks?
- Why is it that the tasks have to be completed?
- What is the value of the tasks (i.e.; how much it is worth paying
to carry out the tasks)?
|
On a project, functional managers are responsible, within their
own areas, for identifying: |
- How the tasks are to be done (i.e.; the procedures and quality
standards)?
- Who will do the work?
- When resources are to become available to do it?
- Where the work will be done (in the functional organization
or in the organization requiring the service)?
|
| The question of when the work will be done generally is a matter
for negotiation between the line and functional managers. Where the
work will be done may also be a matter of negotiation between the
project manager and the functional manager. |
|
| 4. | Make sure the project will contribute to achieving the organization or department’s strategy |
|
|
| The Process of Creating Projects: |
|
|
Projects can often happen at a grassroots level within the organization.
Without a structure put in place to ensure that these projects are
managed in a consistent manner, success will be hit and miss. Oftentimes
management will not support the project if they do not see the benefits.
Alternatively, when strategy development is used to identify key
organizational projects and when a process is put in place to link
all of these projects together with other, more specifically departmental
projects, the result will be a continuous stream of successfully
achieved strategies. |
|
| 5. | Create a Quality Project Office to drive projects and establish central communication between project teams and management |
|
|
| The Quality Project Office |
|
| Very current thinking links Quality to Project Management. Quality
Steering Committees and Quality Councils have been in effect within
organizations for some time now. The creation of a Project
Management Office is a copy of these councils. Current thinking
is to establish an office which oversees all projects and all quality
systems. The prioritization of work is not centered only on projects,
rather it includes key processes to be improved and/or reengineered
in order to better meet customer and other stakeholder expectations.
Similarly, the resourcing of quality systems impacts the resourcing
of projects. An organization must look at the resource requirements
of both.
A Quality Project Office acts as a prime driver for a corporate
transformation and ensures a consistent approach and methodology
for: |
- Managing projects
- Developing business plans
- Creating policies
- Improving processes
- Measuring performance
- Driving cultural change needed to create a customer service
& fiscally responsible driven organization
- Communication—a communications breakdown leads to project
failure in almost half of all projects. Communication is crucial
to a project’s success. It must be made an integral element
of any organization’s project management process.
|
| Therefore, the prioritization of all projects, processes,
planning and other team initiatives, such as Benchmarking, (as this
type of initiative impacts organizational resources) are best managed
by the Quality Project Office. |
|
| 6. | Establish success criteria for each project & measure against it |
|
|
Success criteria will vary with each project. Some of the success
criteria that we see project teams establish include: |
- On-time project completion
- Within-budget project completion
- Client/Customer satisfaction levels
- Quality standards established
- Met project objectives
- Enhanced organization’s reputation
- “Ground breaking”
- Clear requirements set and met
- Committed Sponsor and Project Manager
- Clear vision
- Strong project team with clear and open communication
- Availability of proper skills
- Transition plan included in project plan
|
|
| 7. | Recognize and reward job performance on projects |
|
|
Proper
financial compensation and rewards are important to the morale and
motivation of people in any organization. Projects are
no exception. However, there are several issues that make it challenging:
|
|
| Job Descriptions: |
|
- Issue – Job descriptions do not usually
exist for project management staff. They generally exist only
for the more traditional jobs and job classifications throughout
the organization.
- Solution – Develop job descriptions for
all levels of project personnel. Include appropriate job titles
which reflect their level of responsibilities, authority and accountability.
These can then be benchmarked against existing compensation scales
within the organization to determine relative worth and pay scale
range.
|
| Reporting and Accountability: |
|
- Issue - A matrix organizational structure
illustrates a dual reporting and accountability relationship for
the Project Manager and project team members.
- Solution – Job descriptions should include
reporting relationships. They should also include accountability
and decision-making authorities. Performance Reviews should reflect
not only the work completed by the individual on their job, but
also take into the account the work completed by the individual
on the project(s).
|
| Rewards Determination: |
|
- Issue - These are often difficult to establish,
quantify and administer. The criteria for “doing a good
job” are difficult to quantify. They appear easier within
a traditional role.
- Solution – Clear job descriptions coupled
with specific job goals, which include objectives for job performance
and project performance. Some organizations separate job performance
from project performance in their salary and compensation structures.
- Rewards take many forms. They include a public thank you,
a letter, a plaque, or monetary award. Each organization has
their own methods. It is very important that the project team
be rewarded for the extra effort required to complete the project,
in particular, if successful. When a person had a rewarding
experience, they are more willing to serve the next time they
are asked to join a project team.
|
| Rewarding Project Managers |
| Criteria that can be used to manage, measure, and reward
Project Managers include: |
|
a. Success in leading the project toward pre-established deliverables:
|
- Budget
- Schedule
- Milestones
- Quality
- Technical accomplishments
- Market measure, new business, follow-up on contract
|
b. Utilization of organization’s resources:
|
- Overhead cost reduction
- Working with project team
- Working with other organization’s resources
- Cost-effective decision making
|
c. Ability to build effective project team: |
- Project staffing
- Communications
- Conflict management
- Work with support groups
|
d. Effective planning and implementation: |
- Plan detail and measurability
- Commitment to delivery
- Management involvement
- Contingency provisions
- Reports and reviews
|
e. Customer/client satisfaction:
|
- Perception of overall project performance by sponsor
- Communications with customers/clients
- Stakeholder analysis and follow through
- Responsiveness to change requests
|
f. Participation in business management |
- Keeping management informed of new project/business opportunities
- Bid proposal work
- Management of RFP process
|
g. Technical skills: |
- Technical task completion
- Administrative and organizational complexity
- Multi-disciplinary functional management
- Staffing and start up of project
|
h. Scope of the project:
|
- Total project budget
- Number of personnel involved
- Number of organizations and sub-contractors involved
|
i. Changing work environment: |
- Nature and degree of changes and re-directions
- Contingencies developed
|
|
| Summary |
|
While there may be some risks to consider, for an organization,
when moving into a truly productive project culture, there are also
many rewards reaped by organizations. Creating a productive project
culture using the above 7 steps will help you achieve the many rewards
and reduce or even eliminate the risks. |
|
| About the Author |
|
| As President and CEO of Business Improvement Architects, Michael works with executives and senior managers around the world to help them improve operational effectiveness through strategic planning, leadership development, project management and quality management. He has been instrumental in helping his clients reduce waste and increase efficiencies and profits with his clear processes and quality approach. |
|
| For more information about this article, please contact
bia at info@bia.ca. |
|
| © Business Improvement Architects |